Not only ecologists are talking about emissions of carbon dioxide, plastic pollution of the planet, global warming, and other environmental problems. There are more and more people who are trying to lead an eco-friendly lifestyle. But sometimes out of good intentions, in order to help nature, people take actions that not only do not help to cope with the ecological crisis but also harm the planet.
In this article, we’ve debunked five popular and widespread environmental myths and gathered a few tips on how everyone can contribute to the preservation of the environment and lead an ecologically conscious lifestyle.
Read more: Bury and Forget: How people “struggle” with growth of landfills in Tajikistan
Conclusion: in order to help nature, you need to give up unnecessary trips in any car. Use public transport or bike, and walk more often if possible.
Paper bags are more ecologically friendly than plastic bags
In order to debunk this myth, we use the same approach as above - we will analyze the full life cycle of the product. For the production of a durable paper bag, most often it is not the recycled paper that is used, but fresh, extra long wood and a variety of chemicals. Fabricating and recycling paper bags uses 91% more electricity and 20 times more water than making a plastic bag. The chemicals needed to heat the wood chips poison the water in the territory nearby the factory and cause acid rain. The production of one paper bag is equivalent to the production of several polyethylene bags in terms of the number of resources expended and the generation of harmful emissions. The only way to compensate for the imbalance is to use the paper bag multiple times. However, the same logic can be applied to plastic bags, not throwing them away, but using them until they deteriorate. Although the problem of plastic decomposition after use will still exist. An alternative to paper and plastic is reusable canvas shopping bags that are truly durable and naturally biodegradable.
Logging of old trees can be compensated for by planting a new forest.
Similar to the kidneys and liver in the human body, forests act as a filter to the planet - they purify the air and protect the soil from erosion. It is impossible to compensate for the feeling of one adult tree with five young ones, because new seedlings will not be able to cool and humidify the air, absorb dust to the same extent, and certainly cannot serve as a food base and habitat for fauna. After all, young trees initially lack the amount of green biomass that the previous tree gained for decades. It is biomass that benefits the environment, not the number of seedlings. If we talk about pristine forests, then their deforestation will entail a serious violation of biodiversity. Rare species of plants and animals live in areas untouched by humans. Getting rid of pristine forests, we reduce their habitat and pose a threat to all other living organisms. Planting new trees, of course, is necessary, but in order for them to fully "reveal" their potential, it is necessary to wait for many years. Therefore, along with landscaping areas, the cutting of old trees should be reduced as much as possible.
By buying products with "eco", "bio", "ecological", "natural" labels I help to preserve the nature
In 2014, the analytical company Nielsen surveyed residents of 60 countries around the world about whether they are ready to pay more for a product from a company that promises to contribute to the development of society and the preservation of the environment. More than half of those surveyed (55%) were willing to pay more for “environmentally friendly” goods. Today, unfortunately, marketers overuse consumer desires and label products that are not environmentally friendly. Since there is demand, there must be supply, but in reality, companies need to completely rebuild production processes, purchase new technologies, replace raw materials with more environmentally friendly alternatives in order to reduce waste and significantly reduce the amount of carbon footprint in the atmosphere. In addition, it is necessary to prove to the regulatory authorities that the product is really environmentally friendly and obtain the appropriate certificate and labeling. But, for example, in Tajikistan, there is still no existing procedure for obtaining an eco-label. The Committee for Environmental Protection still does not have a specialized department that would analyze the production and the products themselves. Therefore, most of the local products that the Tajik consumer sees on store shelves that have labels “eco”, “bio”, etc. are not a guarantee that the product is ecologically friendly and safe.