The success of the operation to get Kazakhstanis back from combat zones of Syria can be determined many years afterwards, experts say.
Follow us on LinkedIn
На русском On May 18, the National Security Committee (KNB) of the country posted a short film about the work of the rehabilitation centre based in Aktau, where evacuated women and children were placed. The video shows one of the women who returned from Syria and telling about snipers shooting at them while trying to escape, and their children and them were sent to prisons:
From scratch method
According to the report of the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation, over 40 thousand citizens from 80 countries became affiliated with IS (a terrorist organisation banned in the Republic of Kazakhstan) for over eight years of on-going civil war in Syria.Since 2011, originally neutral Kazakhstan has provided humanitarian aid to Syrian refugees, and in 2017 decided to join the conflict settlement process and arranged peace talks in Astana, where both the Syrian authorities and opposing rebels gathered at one table. Although the results of talks were differently evaluated by the parties, one of the results was the signing of the Regulation “On the working group on the release of detainees/abductees, and handover of the bodies as well as identification of missing persons.” Nur-Sultan has been interested in the positioning of Kazakhstan as a peace-making force, therefore it started to evacuate its nationals from combat areas in the framework of this regulation. Yerlan Karin, a Kazakh presidential adviser, has emphasised this by saying “although many states carry out evacuation, only Kazakhstan has performed such a far-reaching operation.” According to the head of the republican public association “Counterterrorist committee”, Colonel Amanzhol Urazbaev, there are 12 rehabilitation centres for the “returnees” across Kazakhstan. Last year, 300 million tenges (almost 792 thousand dollars) were allocated from the budget for the establishment of nine of them. This year three more regions joined the project and additional funds were allocated. “One of the key implementers of the programme is Pravo Public Foundation. Just recently we have had a meeting with them and monitored the efficiency of our work. The impressions are the most positive, I’ say. The most difficult thing is to work with children. We don’t have a method of working with children who came back from the combat zone, so we have to do many things from scratch, develop new things,” Urazbaev said.
Time will tell
According to Anna Gusarova, every country of the world solves the problem of children who have been to Syria in their own way. One of the criteria is the age of the returnees. However, this issue is far more complicated.“How certain can we be about whether those children and women have held weapons? Have they fought, no matter if voluntarily or forced? This is the second question asked by decision-makers,” Gusarova said. The age question is right now being raised in Europe, the United States and other countries where the children are being returned. The government of Belgium, for example, has ordered to return children below 10 years of age only. Decisions about older children are made on a case by case basis. In the United Kingdom, given the older age of the departed, 14 to 29, stricter measures are being taken – from deprivation of citizenship and deportation to the country of second citizenship, if any. Earlier, the authorities of Kazakhstan announced strict measures, up to the termination of citizenship, against the returnees who were found to participate in combat operations. In early May 2019, the four residents of Aktobe region, who were brought back to Kazakhstan from Syria under the special operation “Zhussan-2”, were reported to be the accused in criminal cases. One of them was suspected of “participation in military actions in Syria”, three others of “propaganda of terrorism” and “inciting religious hatred.” On May 15, the Aktobe regional court imposed a pre-trial restraint on them – a two-month detention. Experts emphasise that it is very difficult to speak about the effectiveness of return operations, including “Zhussan” and “Zhussan-2”. From the military point of view, operations have been successful – people have returned to their home country. However, we can exactly tell if the rehabilitation was successful in 5-10 years, when the children grow up. According to Gusarova, when people return from war, it’s hard to say how it will be, so the world is having major debates at different levels about what to do and how to deal with these people: “There have been many different statements about “ticking bomb” and other things. I’m not telling about the unique nature of our rehabilitation experience. We are well aware about the work to be done with women and widows – psychological with religious components. Children should be socialised; they should attend kindergartens, schools. We’ll see how well they have joined the Kazakhstan society only after a while.”
This publication was produced under IWPR project «Forging links and raising voices to combat radicalization in Central Asia»