By 2025, five out of six Turkic-speaking countries will be using Latin alphabet. It’s the year when Kazakhstan will switch from Cyrillic to Latin alphabet.
Follow us on LinkedIn
The reasons for this switch and the need for it are diverse. Some experts think this decision highlights the cooling in relations between Kazakhstan and Russia, a desire to distance away from the Soviet past and to focus on the West.
Others say this issue should not be politicised and explain the switch to Latin alphabet by the demand of the modern world and the need for cultural self-identity.
Back in the Soviet period, the Kazakh alphabet changed twice. In 1929, it was changed to Latin alphabet and in 1940 to Cyrillic alphabet.
The initiator of the language reform in Kazakhstan in 2017 was president Nursultan Nazarbayev, who claimed that introduction of the Latin alphabet was a step toward integration with the common developing information world and the global system of science and culture. He denied categorically a version of changes in the geopolitical preferences of the country:
Moreover, extra money will be required for the republication of other literature published within 80 years of Cyrillic alphabet, as well as for the adaptation of all public documents, passports, laws, change of markings, signs, retraining of teachers and specialists in other spheres, outreach campaign among people, etc.
And the uncalculated expenses of the private sector, which will be individually responsible for them. The feasibility of implementation of this project within the specified tight deadlines and the return on investments to the language reform raise many questions among experts.
Similar language reforms were implemented in the 90s by Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, and we need to learn from their experience.
The first to switch to Latin alphabet was Azerbaijan, right after the declaration of its state independence.
The country thinks this has contributed to the expansion of cooperation with the countries of Europe and the United States. However, the experience of neighbouring Georgia shows that Latin alphabet is not a must for building ties with the world.
Georgia uses its unique, unlike any other, alphabet, which is absolutely odd for foreigners. However, the country is not short of investments, and even outstrips Azerbaijan in the number of foreign tourists. Moreover, the level of English proficiency here is higher, at least among young people, than in other former Soviet countries.
According to an Azerbaijan-based expert, director of international online information and analytical centre “Ethnoglobus”, Gulnara Inandzh, a switch to Latin alphabet in Azerbaijan in early 1990s was related to the development of a national consciousness, slogans of unity with Turkey:
According to experts, the reform of the alphabet change in Azerbaijan can be deemed successful. Today, Latin alphabet is introduced in all spheres of activity, mastered by the population, while Cyrillic alphabet is sometimes used commonly by the older generation.
Today Azerbaijan is the only example of successful switch to Latin alphabet among Turkic-speaking countries.
The game of politics
Uzbekistan officially abandoned the Cyrillic alphabet in the 1990s. However, the Latin alphabet is introduced only in the education system. Media, state authorities and other institutions still widely use the Cyrillic alphabet.
According to the Uzbek researcher and alumnus of the CABAR.asia School of Analytics, Elyor Usmanov, there are no legal obstacles to the introduction of the Latin script in daily use, and it is just a matter of time.
“Thanks to the smooth switch of the education system to the Latin alphabet, the younger generation of Uzbekistanis uses the Latin alphabet. However, the older generation, which holds leading positions today, finds it easier to use the Cyrillic script. Thus, the total switch to Latin alphabet will be possible only with the generational change,” Usmanov said.
An Uzbek researcher and candidate of historical sciences, Bakhtiyor Alimdzhanov, feels less optimistic. According to him, the switch to the Latin alphabet was the game of politics played by the “national intelligentsia”.
Switch to Latin alphabet in three years
Turkmenistan has also faced difficulties when switching from Cyrillic to Latin alphabet.
One of the reasons, according to researcher Svetlana Dzardanova, was that in the middle of the 1990s, when the language reform started, not all people in the country could speak Turkmen language fluently.
The switch to Latin alphabet was fast and radical in the country. The authorities made a decision in 1993 specifying that the process should be completed in three years. As a result, official documents of Turkmenistan were switched to Latin script only by 2000. The education system also couldn’t adapt fast, which led to illiteracy among people.
Time will tell
As a result of the pending language reform in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan will be the only Turkic-speaking country in a few years that uses the Cyrillic alphabet.
The General Secretary of the Parliamentary Assembly of Turkic-speaking Countries (TURKPA), Altynbek Mamayusupov, in his comment to CABAR.asia noted that much attention is paid to the state language in Kyrgyzstan, which he represents, and the main thing for the country is to preserve, develop and hand down the national language to future generations.
“Time will tell if Kyrgyzstan will have the need to switch to Latin alphabet. However, we should understand that it’s a time-consuming process to switch to another alphabet, which requires comprehensive and thorough approach,” Mamayusupov said.
In his opinion, even if all former Soviet Turkic countries switch to the Latin alphabet, it won’t affect the role and place of Russian language in these countries. According to Mamayusupov, any reform is a normal process for any democratic society, and it’s up to every independent state:
Данный материал подготовлен в рамках проекта «Giving Voice, Driving Change — from the Borderland to the Steppes Project», реализуемого при финансовой поддержке Министерства иностранных дел Норвегии. Мнения, озвученные в статье, не отражают позицию редакции или донора.